{"id":2629,"date":"2013-10-25T16:29:40","date_gmt":"2013-10-25T21:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/wordpress\/?p=2629"},"modified":"2017-08-29T13:23:12","modified_gmt":"2017-08-29T18:23:12","slug":"the-monty-hall-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/the-monty-hall-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"The Monty Hall Problem"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2630\" alt=\"goat\" src=\"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-150x150.jpg\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-150x150.jpg 150w, http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-32x32.jpg 32w, http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-64x64.jpg 64w, http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-96x96.jpg 96w, http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/10\/goat-128x128.jpg 128w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>&#8220;You are the contestant\u00a0on a game show that has 3 doors. One of them conceals\u00a0a big prize. After picking\u00a0a door (either A, B, or C), the show&#8217;s host reveals an unpicked losing door. He then asks if you&#8217;d\u00a0rather change to the remaining unopened door, or stick with the one you had\u00a0initially selected.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do you switch, or do you stick with your original door?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Contrary to what\u00a0some may think, this classic\u00a0&#8220;Let&#8217;s Make a Deal&#8221; probability puzzle\u00a0proves that IF the contestant chooses a different door than the one picked first, they increase their probability of winning to two-thirds.\u00a0No tricks. I&#8217;m serious.<\/p>\n<p>(Let&#8217;s say that Door C is the winner.)<\/p>\n<p>Scenario 1:\u00a0Choose Door A. Door B is revealed. <span style=\"color: #99cc00;\">SWITCHING WINS<\/span>.<br \/>\nScenario 2:\u00a0Choose Door B. Door A is revealed. <span style=\"color: #99cc00;\">SWITCHING WINS<\/span>.<br \/>\nScenario 3:\u00a0Choose Door C. Door A\u00a0or B is revealed. <span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">SWITCHING LOSES<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Switching your initial choice has a higher chance of landing the ultimate prize!<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>It boils down to this: when the contestant makes the original choice, they have a\u00a01:3 chance of picking correctly. But then the game changes. After the\u00a0host removes an option, you&#8217;re down to one good answer of two total doors.\u00a0(It WOULD be simple probability if the contestant\u00a0was presented with only\u00a0two doors from the get-go.) If the player DOESN&#8217;T SWITCH, they&#8217;re assuming they&#8217;ve picked the prize accurately in round 1&#8230;. which isn&#8217;t likely. SWITCHING acknowledges\u00a0this and effectively reverses the player&#8217;s chances. In fact,\u00a0picking a dud door with this method isn&#8217;t likely.<\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t believe it?\u00a0Get a friend and 3 playing cards to see if you can&#8217;t statistically debunk the theory. If a &#8220;wrong&#8221; card is revealed and a contestant switches cards during phase two every time,\u00a0I predict\u00a0they&#8217;ll have a 66% success rate of getting the big prize&#8230;. as opposed to 33%\u00a0probability if\u00a0never switching answers. Strangely, the contestant\u00a0is likely to win if they choose wrong\u00a0in the first phase.\u00a0Your odds are initially slim, then\u00a0double in the player&#8217;s favor\u00a0upon flipping answers. Cool, huh?<\/p>\n<p>The big question is: how many would naturally switch choices without this knowledge?!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;You are the contestant\u00a0on a game show that has 3 doors. One of them conceals\u00a0a big prize. After picking\u00a0a door (either A, B, or C), the show&#8217;s host reveals an unpicked losing door. He then asks if you&#8217;d\u00a0rather change to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/the-monty-hall-problem\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2629","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blurbs-and-links"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2629","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2629"}],"version-history":[{"count":26,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2629\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2658,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2629\/revisions\/2658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2629"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2629"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/skullduggery.us\/rants\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2629"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}